SSlopdar
26slop score / 100
Suspiciously Clean
🔥 roasted 2 times

Is xpitch.in built or slop?

Slopdar scanned xpitch.in and gave it a Slop Score of 26/100 (Suspiciously Clean). 4 AI / vibe-coding tells were found. These are signals, not proof.

“Still shipping the create-next-app furniture. Vercel says hi.”

Caught on camera
Screenshot of xpitch.in
The usual suspects
Next.js

The receipts

4 tells found
01
High em-dash density+10
Em-dashes show up unusually often. A classic LLM writing tic.
Copy tell
02
Gradient blobs / aurora+9
Large blurred gradient backgrounds: a stock decorative pattern.
Layout tell
03
Stock Next.js setup+6
Next.js with no apparent customisation of the default scaffold.
Default asset
04
No custom favicon+5
The site ships without a favicon link.
Low-effort tell
Signs a human was here
✓
Considered metadata-4
A real meta description plus Open Graph tags show care.
Human signal

Slopdar reports signals, not proof. A high score means a site smells templated, not that no human was ever involved.

Fix your slop

up to 24 points on the table

Every tell below can be cleared. Do it by hand, or copy the fix prompt and paste it into whatever built this (Claude Code, Cursor, Lovable, you name it). Then re-scan and watch the score drop.

01
High em-dash densityclears +10
Rewrite the copy with fewer em dashes. Use periods, commas or a rephrase instead.
02
Gradient blobs / auroraclears +9
Replace the blurred gradient blob backgrounds with something specific to your brand.
03
No custom faviconclears +5
Add a favicon.
Quick winshuman signs the radar rewards
+
Add real pagesReal about / pricing / contact pages linked from the homepage are a strong human sign.
+
Link your GitHubIf the project is open source or you have a real profile, link it.
+
Custom typographyA deliberately chosen web font reads as a human decision.

The prompt only removes the tells Slopdar can see. Making the site genuinely good is still on you.