SSlopdar
21slop score / 100
Hand-Crafted
🔥 roasted once

Is vignan.ac.in built or slop?

Slopdar scanned vignan.ac.in and gave it a Slop Score of 21/100 (Hand-Crafted). 3 AI / vibe-coding tells were found. These are signals, not proof.

“No lucide icons. No lorem ipsum. Who hurt the template industry?”

Caught on camera
Screenshot of vignan.ac.in
The usual suspects
BootstrapGoogle Analytics

The receipts

3 tells found
01
AI vocabulary cluster+10
A cluster of words LLMs overuse (delve, leverage, robust, etc.) appears in the copy.
Copy tell
02
Dead placeholder links+10
Many links still point to "#" or example.com.
Leftover junk
03
Formal AI connectors+5
Sentence-starting "Additionally / Moreover / Furthermore" used repeatedly.
Copy tell
Signs a human was here
✓
Considered metadata-2
A real meta description plus Open Graph tags show care.
Human signal
✓
Custom favicon-2
A real, non-default favicon, a small sign someone cared.
Human signal

Slopdar reports signals, not proof. A high score means a site smells templated, not that no human was ever involved.

Fix your slop

up to 25 points on the table

Every tell below can be cleared. Do it by hand, or copy the fix prompt and paste it into whatever built this (Claude Code, Cursor, Lovable, you name it). Then re-scan and watch the score drop.

01
AI vocabulary clusterclears +10
Swap LLM-favourite words (delve, leverage, robust) for plain ones.
02
Dead placeholder linksclears +10
Point the dead "#" links at real pages, or remove them.
03
Formal AI connectorsclears +5
Cut the repeated "Additionally / Moreover / Furthermore" sentence openers.
Quick winshuman signs the radar rewards
+
Add real pagesReal about / pricing / contact pages linked from the homepage are a strong human sign.
+
Link your GitHubIf the project is open source or you have a real profile, link it.
+
Custom typographyA deliberately chosen web font reads as a human decision.

The prompt only removes the tells Slopdar can see. Making the site genuinely good is still on you.