30slop score / 100
Suspiciously Clean
Is v-1.design built or slop?
Slopdar scanned v-1.design and gave it a Slop Score of 30/100 (Suspiciously Clean). 6 AI / vibe-coding tells were found. These are signals, not proof.
“Suspiciously clean. Either a careful human, or a very careful prompt.”
Caught on camera
The usual suspects
BootstrapNext.jsVercel
The receipts
6 tells found01
High em-dash density+10
Em-dashes show up unusually often. A classic LLM writing tic.
Copy tell
02
Bento-grid layout+9
Bento-style grid markup: a default AI landing-page pattern.
Layout tell
03
Gradient blobs / aurora+9
Large blurred gradient backgrounds: a stock decorative pattern.
Layout tell
04
lucide-react icons+8
The default icon set shipped with most AI-generated UIs.
Default asset
05
Stock Next.js setup+6
Next.js with no apparent customisation of the default scaffold.
Default asset
06
Hosted on Vercel+6
Vercel hosting headers were present.
Stack tell
Signs a human was here
✓
Real site pages-8
Links to genuine pages (about, blog, pricing, docs) suggest real effort.
Human signal
✓
Considered metadata-4
A real meta description plus Open Graph tags show care.
Human signal
✓
Custom typography-3
Self-hosted or custom web fonts, not just system defaults.
Human signal
✓
Custom favicon-3
A real, non-default favicon, a small sign someone cared.
Human signal
Slopdar reports signals, not proof. A high score means a site smells templated, not that no human was ever involved.