SSlopdar
8slop score / 100
Hand-Crafted
🔥 roasted once

Is thomas.how built or slop?

Slopdar scanned thomas.how and gave it a Slop Score of 8/100 (Hand-Crafted). 2 AI / vibe-coding tells were found. These are signals, not proof.

We scanned for slop and found craftsmanship. Disgusting. Wonderful.

Caught on camera
Screenshot of thomas.how
The usual suspects
BootstrapCloudflareVercel

The receipts

2 tells found
01
Gradient blobs / aurora+9
Large blurred gradient backgrounds: a stock decorative pattern.
Layout tell
02
Hosted on Vercel+6
Vercel hosting headers were present.
Stack tell
Signs a human was here
Links to GitHub-3
A real GitHub link points to actual source or a real person.
Human signal
Considered metadata-2
A real meta description plus Open Graph tags show care.
Human signal
Custom typography-2
Self-hosted or custom web fonts, not just system defaults.
Human signal

Slopdar reports signals, not proof. A high score means a site smells templated, not that no human was ever involved.

Fix your slop

up to 9 points on the table

Every tell below can be cleared. Do it by hand, or copy the fix prompt and paste it into whatever built this (Claude Code, Cursor, Lovable, you name it). Then re-scan and watch the score drop.

01
Gradient blobs / auroraclears +9
Replace the blurred gradient blob backgrounds with something specific to your brand.
Quick winshuman signs the radar rewards
+
Add real pagesReal about / pricing / contact pages linked from the homepage are a strong human sign.
+
Custom faviconA non-default favicon is a small sign someone cared.

The prompt only removes the tells Slopdar can see. Making the site genuinely good is still on you.