56slop score / 100
Vibe-Coded
Is swifttunnel.net built or slop?
Slopdar scanned swifttunnel.net and gave it a Slop Score of 56/100 (Vibe-Coded). 8 AI / vibe-coding tells were found. These are signals, not proof.
“Half artisan, half autocomplete. We can see the seams from here.”
Caught on camera
The usual suspects
BootstrapNext.jsSupabaseVercel
The receipts
8 tells found01
Placeholder brand name+16
Template placeholders like "Your Company" / "Acme" remain.
Leftover junk
02
Untouched shadcn/ui+12
Default shadcn/ui class signatures with no custom theming.
Default asset
03
Classic vibe-coding stack+10
Next.js + Vercel + Supabase together: the default AI-build combo.
Stack tell
04
lucide-react icons+8
The default icon set shipped with most AI-generated UIs.
Default asset
05
Supabase backend+7
Supabase client / project references were found.
Stack tell
06
Stock Next.js setup+6
Next.js with no apparent customisation of the default scaffold.
Default asset
07
Three-feature-card grid+6
The hero-plus-three-cards layout AI builders default to.
Layout tell
08
Hosted on Vercel+6
Vercel hosting headers were present.
Stack tell
Signs a human was here
✓
Links to GitHub-5
A real GitHub link points to actual source or a real person.
Human signal
✓
Considered metadata-4
A real meta description plus Open Graph tags show care.
Human signal
✓
Custom typography-3
Self-hosted or custom web fonts, not just system defaults.
Human signal
✓
Custom favicon-3
A real, non-default favicon, a small sign someone cared.
Human signal
Slopdar reports signals, not proof. A high score means a site smells templated, not that no human was ever involved.