27slop score / 100
Suspiciously Clean
Is swiftin.dev built or slop?
Slopdar scanned swiftin.dev and gave it a Slop Score of 27/100 (Suspiciously Clean). 6 AI / vibe-coding tells were found. These are signals, not proof.
“Suspiciously clean. Either a careful human, or a very careful prompt.”
Caught on camera
The usual suspects
BootstrapNext.jsTailwind CSSVercel
The receipts
6 tells found01
lucide-react icons+8
The default icon set shipped with most AI-generated UIs.
Default asset
02
Stock Next.js setup+6
Next.js with no apparent customisation of the default scaffold.
Default asset
03
Three-feature-card grid+6
The hero-plus-three-cards layout AI builders default to.
Layout tell
04
Hosted on Vercel+6
Vercel hosting headers were present.
Stack tell
05
Images missing alt text+6
Most images have no alt text, a sign of unreviewed output.
Low-effort tell
06
Dark mode with neon accents+5
A near-black background with saturated neon accents, a common AI look.
Layout tell
Signs a human was here
✓
Real site pages-4
Links to genuine pages (about, blog, pricing, docs) suggest real effort.
Human signal
✓
Considered metadata-2
A real meta description plus Open Graph tags show care.
Human signal
✓
Custom typography-2
Self-hosted or custom web fonts, not just system defaults.
Human signal
✓
Custom favicon-2
A real, non-default favicon, a small sign someone cared.
Human signal
Slopdar reports signals, not proof. A high score means a site smells templated, not that no human was ever involved.