46slop score / 100
Suspiciously Clean
Is superx.so built or slop?
Slopdar scanned superx.so and gave it a Slop Score of 46/100 (Suspiciously Clean). 6 AI / vibe-coding tells were found. These are signals, not proof.
“Suspiciously clean. Either a careful human, or a very careful prompt.”
Caught on camera
The usual suspects
BootstrapCloudflareFramerGoogle AnalyticsNext.jsTailwind CSSVercel
The receipts
6 tells found01
Made with Framer+28
The page was published by Framer (no-code site builder).
Tool fingerprint
02
lucide-react icons+8
The default icon set shipped with most AI-generated UIs.
Default asset
03
"Trusted by" logo row+7
A "Trusted by" / "As seen in" social-proof row was found.
Layout tell
04
Stock Next.js setup+6
Next.js with no apparent customisation of the default scaffold.
Default asset
05
Three-feature-card grid+6
The hero-plus-three-cards layout AI builders default to.
Layout tell
06
Hosted on Vercel+6
Vercel hosting headers were present.
Stack tell
Signs a human was here
✓
Real site pages-8
Links to genuine pages (about, blog, pricing, docs) suggest real effort.
Human signal
✓
Considered metadata-4
A real meta description plus Open Graph tags show care.
Human signal
✓
Custom typography-3
Self-hosted or custom web fonts, not just system defaults.
Human signal
Slopdar reports signals, not proof. A high score means a site smells templated, not that no human was ever involved.