SSlopdar
26slop score / 100
Suspiciously Clean
🔥 roasted once

Is supasplit.app built or slop?

Slopdar scanned supasplit.app and gave it a Slop Score of 26/100 (Suspiciously Clean). 5 AI / vibe-coding tells were found. These are signals, not proof.

Still shipping the create-next-app furniture. Vercel says hi.

Scan your own site →
Caught on camera
Screenshot of supasplit.app
The usual suspects
BootstrapGoogle AnalyticsNext.jsVercel

The receipts

5 tells found
01
Gradient blobs / aurora+9
Large blurred gradient backgrounds: a stock decorative pattern.
Layout tell
02
Stock Next.js setup+6
Next.js with no apparent customisation of the default scaffold.
Default asset
03
Three-feature-card grid+6
The hero-plus-three-cards layout AI builders default to.
Layout tell
04
Hosted on Vercel+6
Vercel hosting headers were present.
Stack tell
05
Dark mode with neon accents+5
A near-black background with saturated neon accents, a common AI look.
Layout tell
Signs a human was here
Considered metadata-2
A real meta description plus Open Graph tags show care.
Human signal
Custom typography-2
Self-hosted or custom web fonts, not just system defaults.
Human signal
Custom favicon-2
A real, non-default favicon, a small sign someone cared.
Human signal

Slopdar reports signals, not proof. A high score means a site smells templated, not that no human was ever involved.