29slop score / 100
Suspiciously Clean
🔥 roasted once
Is sumitjewellers.in built or slop?
Slopdar scanned sumitjewellers.in and gave it a Slop Score of 29/100 (Suspiciously Clean). 5 AI / vibe-coding tells were found. These are signals, not proof.
“Still shipping the create-next-app furniture. Vercel says hi.”
Caught on camera
The usual suspects
BootstrapNext.jsVercel
The receipts
5 tells found01
lucide-react icons+8
The default icon set shipped with most AI-generated UIs.
Default asset
02
Stock Next.js setup+6
Next.js with no apparent customisation of the default scaffold.
Default asset
03
Three-feature-card grid+6
The hero-plus-three-cards layout AI builders default to.
Layout tell
04
Hosted on Vercel+6
Vercel hosting headers were present.
Stack tell
05
No custom favicon+5
The site ships without a favicon link.
Low-effort tell
Signs a human was here
✓
Considered metadata-2
A real meta description plus Open Graph tags show care.
Human signal
Slopdar reports signals, not proof. A high score means a site smells templated, not that no human was ever involved.
Fix your slop
up to 19 points on the tableEvery tell below can be cleared. Do it by hand, or copy the fix prompt and paste it into whatever built this (Claude Code, Cursor, Lovable, you name it). Then re-scan and watch the score drop.
01
lucide-react iconsclears +8
lucide is fine on its own. It reads as a tell when everything else is also default. Consider a different icon set or a few custom icons.
02
Three-feature-card gridclears +6
The hero-plus-three-cards layout is the AI default. Vary it if your content allows.
03
No custom faviconclears +5
Add a favicon.
Quick winshuman signs the radar rewards
+
Add real pagesReal about / pricing / contact pages linked from the homepage are a strong human sign.
+
Link your GitHubIf the project is open source or you have a real profile, link it.
+
Custom typographyA deliberately chosen web font reads as a human decision.
The prompt only removes the tells Slopdar can see. Making the site genuinely good is still on you.