42slop score / 100
Suspiciously Clean
🔥 roasted once
Is subscriptionpilot.app built or slop?
Slopdar scanned subscriptionpilot.app and gave it a Slop Score of 42/100 (Suspiciously Clean). 7 AI / vibe-coding tells were found. These are signals, not proof.
“Dark mode, neon glow. The official uniform of 'trust us, we're an AI startup'.”
Caught on camera
The usual suspects
BootstrapNext.jsTailwind CSSVercel
The receipts
7 tells found01
Gradient blobs / aurora+9
Large blurred gradient backgrounds: a stock decorative pattern.
Layout tell
02
lucide-react icons+8
The default icon set shipped with most AI-generated UIs.
Default asset
03
Signature AI gradient palette+8
The blue/indigo/violet gradient AI builds reach for by default.
Layout tell
04
Stock Next.js setup+6
Next.js with no apparent customisation of the default scaffold.
Default asset
05
Three-feature-card grid+6
The hero-plus-three-cards layout AI builders default to.
Layout tell
06
Hosted on Vercel+6
Vercel hosting headers were present.
Stack tell
07
Dark mode with neon accents+5
A near-black background with saturated neon accents, a common AI look.
Layout tell
Signs a human was here
✓
Considered metadata-2
A real meta description plus Open Graph tags show care.
Human signal
✓
Custom typography-2
Self-hosted or custom web fonts, not just system defaults.
Human signal
✓
Custom favicon-2
A real, non-default favicon, a small sign someone cared.
Human signal
Slopdar reports signals, not proof. A high score means a site smells templated, not that no human was ever involved.