53slop score / 100
Vibe-Coded
Is startupsubmit.app built or slop?
Slopdar scanned startupsubmit.app and gave it a Slop Score of 53/100 (Vibe-Coded). 7 AI / vibe-coding tells were found. These are signals, not proof.
“Half artisan, half autocomplete. We can see the seams from here.”
Caught on camera
The usual suspects
BootstrapGoogle AnalyticsTailwind CSS
The receipts
7 tells found01
Tailwind via CDN+14
Tailwind loaded from the play CDN: a prototyping/quick-build tell.
Default asset
02
Gradient blobs / aurora+9
Large blurred gradient backgrounds: a stock decorative pattern.
Layout tell
03
Signature AI gradient palette+8
The blue/indigo/violet gradient AI builds reach for by default.
Layout tell
04
Placeholder images+8
Stock placeholder image services (placehold.co, via.placeholder).
Leftover junk
05
"Trusted by" logo row+7
A "Trusted by" / "As seen in" social-proof row was found.
Layout tell
06
Three-feature-card grid+6
The hero-plus-three-cards layout AI builders default to.
Layout tell
07
Dark mode with neon accents+5
A near-black background with saturated neon accents, a common AI look.
Layout tell
Signs a human was here
✓
Considered metadata-2
A real meta description plus Open Graph tags show care.
Human signal
✓
Custom favicon-2
A real, non-default favicon, a small sign someone cared.
Human signal
Slopdar reports signals, not proof. A high score means a site smells templated, not that no human was ever involved.