SSlopdar
6slop score / 100
Hand-Crafted
🔥 roasted once

Is soundriver.com built or slop?

Slopdar scanned soundriver.com and gave it a Slop Score of 6/100 (Hand-Crafted). 2 AI / vibe-coding tells were found. These are signals, not proof.

“You wrote your own CSS. In this economy?”

Caught on camera
Screenshot of soundriver.com
The usual suspects
React

The receipts

2 tells found
01
Missing social/meta tags+6
No meta description and no Open Graph tags, a low-effort sign.
Low-effort tell
02
No lang attribute+4
The <html> tag has no lang attribute set.
Low-effort tell
Signs a human was here
✓
Custom typography-2
Self-hosted or custom web fonts, not just system defaults.
Human signal
✓
Custom favicon-2
A real, non-default favicon, a small sign someone cared.
Human signal

Slopdar reports signals, not proof. A high score means a site smells templated, not that no human was ever involved.

Fix your slop

up to 10 points on the table

Every tell below can be cleared. Do it by hand, or copy the fix prompt and paste it into whatever built this (Claude Code, Cursor, Lovable, you name it). Then re-scan and watch the score drop.

01
Missing social/meta tagsclears +6
Add a real meta description and Open Graph tags.
02
No lang attributeclears +4
Add a lang attribute to the <html> tag.
Quick winshuman signs the radar rewards
+
Add real pagesReal about / pricing / contact pages linked from the homepage are a strong human sign.
+
Link your GitHubIf the project is open source or you have a real profile, link it.

The prompt only removes the tells Slopdar can see. Making the site genuinely good is still on you.