29slop score / 100
Suspiciously Clean
🔥 roasted once
Is soma.co.zw built or slop?
Slopdar scanned soma.co.zw and gave it a Slop Score of 29/100 (Suspiciously Clean). 4 AI / vibe-coding tells were found. These are signals, not proof.
“Buzzword density: enterprise grade.”
Caught on camera
The usual suspects
BootstrapVercel
The receipts
4 tells found01
AI marketing buzzwords+12
Clusters of "elevate / seamless / supercharge"-style filler.
Copy tell
02
"Trusted by" logo row+7
A "Trusted by" / "As seen in" social-proof row was found.
Layout tell
03
Hosted on Vercel+6
Vercel hosting headers were present.
Stack tell
04
Images missing alt text+6
Most images have no alt text, a sign of unreviewed output.
Low-effort tell
Signs a human was here
✓
Custom favicon-2
A real, non-default favicon, a small sign someone cared.
Human signal
Slopdar reports signals, not proof. A high score means a site smells templated, not that no human was ever involved.
Fix your slop
up to 25 points on the tableEvery tell below can be cleared. Do it by hand, or copy the fix prompt and paste it into whatever built this (Claude Code, Cursor, Lovable, you name it). Then re-scan and watch the score drop.
01
AI marketing buzzwordsclears +12
Replace marketing buzzwords with concrete statements about what the product actually does.
02
"Trusted by" logo rowclears +7
Only keep the "Trusted by" row if the logos are real. If they are not, remove it.
03
Images missing alt textclears +6
Add alt text to the images that are missing it.
Quick winshuman signs the radar rewards
+
Add real pagesReal about / pricing / contact pages linked from the homepage are a strong human sign.
+
Link your GitHubIf the project is open source or you have a real profile, link it.
+
Considered metadataA real meta description plus Open Graph tags show care.
+
Custom typographyA deliberately chosen web font reads as a human decision.
The prompt only removes the tells Slopdar can see. Making the site genuinely good is still on you.