41slop score / 100
Suspiciously Clean
🔥 roasted once
Is soar.trade built or slop?
Slopdar scanned soar.trade and gave it a Slop Score of 41/100 (Suspiciously Clean). 6 AI / vibe-coding tells were found. These are signals, not proof.
“Suspiciously clean. Either a careful human, or a very careful prompt.”
Caught on camera
The usual suspects
Google AnalyticsNext.jsSupabaseVercel
The receipts
6 tells found01
High em-dash density+10
Em-dashes show up unusually often. A classic LLM writing tic.
Copy tell
02
Classic vibe-coding stack+10
Next.js + Vercel + Supabase together: the default AI-build combo.
Stack tell
03
Supabase backend+7
Supabase client / project references were found.
Stack tell
04
Stock Next.js setup+6
Next.js with no apparent customisation of the default scaffold.
Default asset
05
Hosted on Vercel+6
Vercel hosting headers were present.
Stack tell
06
Images missing alt text+6
Most images have no alt text, a sign of unreviewed output.
Low-effort tell
Signs a human was here
✓
Considered metadata-2
A real meta description plus Open Graph tags show care.
Human signal
✓
Custom favicon-2
A real, non-default favicon, a small sign someone cared.
Human signal
Slopdar reports signals, not proof. A high score means a site smells templated, not that no human was ever involved.