SSlopdar
18slop score / 100
Hand-Crafted
🔥 roasted once

Is skloud.app built or slop?

Slopdar scanned skloud.app and gave it a Slop Score of 18/100 (Hand-Crafted). 3 AI / vibe-coding tells were found. These are signals, not proof.

“Our radar came back with nothing but respect and mild jealousy.”

Caught on camera
Screenshot of skloud.app
The usual suspects
BootstrapGoogle AnalyticsNuxtTailwind CSSVue.js

The receipts

3 tells found
01
lucide-react icons+8
The default icon set shipped with most AI-generated UIs.
Default asset
02
Images missing alt text+6
Most images have no alt text, a sign of unreviewed output.
Low-effort tell
03
No lang attribute+4
The <html> tag has no lang attribute set.
Low-effort tell

Slopdar reports signals, not proof. A high score means a site smells templated, not that no human was ever involved.

Fix your slop

up to 18 points on the table

Every tell below can be cleared. Do it by hand, or copy the fix prompt and paste it into whatever built this (Claude Code, Cursor, Lovable, you name it). Then re-scan and watch the score drop.

01
lucide-react iconsclears +8
lucide is fine on its own. It reads as a tell when everything else is also default. Consider a different icon set or a few custom icons.
02
Images missing alt textclears +6
Add alt text to the images that are missing it.
03
No lang attributeclears +4
Add a lang attribute to the <html> tag.
Quick winshuman signs the radar rewards
+
Add real pagesReal about / pricing / contact pages linked from the homepage are a strong human sign.
+
Link your GitHubIf the project is open source or you have a real profile, link it.
+
Considered metadataA real meta description plus Open Graph tags show care.
+
Custom typographyA deliberately chosen web font reads as a human decision.
+
Custom faviconA non-default favicon is a small sign someone cared.

The prompt only removes the tells Slopdar can see. Making the site genuinely good is still on you.