SSlopdar
26slop score / 100
Suspiciously Clean
🔥 roasted once

Is sedimentary.it built or slop?

Slopdar scanned sedimentary.it and gave it a Slop Score of 26/100 (Suspiciously Clean). 3 AI / vibe-coding tells were found. These are signals, not proof.

“'Your Company' is still in the copy. We assume that's the legal name.”

Caught on camera
Screenshot of sedimentary.it
The usual suspects
BootstrapNext.js

The receipts

3 tells found
01
Placeholder brand name+16
Template placeholders like "Your Company" / "Acme" remain.
Leftover junk
02
High em-dash density+10
Em-dashes show up unusually often. A classic LLM writing tic.
Copy tell
03
Stock Next.js setup+6
Next.js with no apparent customisation of the default scaffold.
Default asset
Signs a human was here
✓
Considered metadata-2
A real meta description plus Open Graph tags show care.
Human signal
✓
Custom typography-2
Self-hosted or custom web fonts, not just system defaults.
Human signal
✓
Custom favicon-2
A real, non-default favicon, a small sign someone cared.
Human signal

Slopdar reports signals, not proof. A high score means a site smells templated, not that no human was ever involved.

Fix your slop

up to 26 points on the table

Every tell below can be cleared. Do it by hand, or copy the fix prompt and paste it into whatever built this (Claude Code, Cursor, Lovable, you name it). Then re-scan and watch the score drop.

01
Placeholder brand nameclears +16
Replace placeholder brand names with your real name.
02
High em-dash densityclears +10
Rewrite the copy with fewer em dashes. Use periods, commas or a rephrase instead.
Quick winshuman signs the radar rewards
+
Add real pagesReal about / pricing / contact pages linked from the homepage are a strong human sign.
+
Link your GitHubIf the project is open source or you have a real profile, link it.

The prompt only removes the tells Slopdar can see. Making the site genuinely good is still on you.