54slop score / 100
Vibe-Coded
🔥 roasted 2 times
Is seatplan.io built or slop?
Slopdar scanned seatplan.io and gave it a Slop Score of 54/100 (Vibe-Coded). 6 AI / vibe-coding tells were found. These are signals, not proof.
“Half artisan, half autocomplete. We can see the seams from here.”
Caught on camera
The usual suspects
BootstrapNext.js
The receipts
6 tells found01
Placeholder brand name+16
Template placeholders like "Your Company" / "Acme" remain.
Leftover junk
02
Untouched shadcn/ui+12
Default shadcn/ui class signatures with no custom theming.
Default asset
03
AI marketing buzzwords+12
Clusters of "elevate / seamless / supercharge"-style filler.
Copy tell
04
High em-dash density+10
Em-dashes show up unusually often. A classic LLM writing tic.
Copy tell
05
lucide-react icons+8
The default icon set shipped with most AI-generated UIs.
Default asset
06
Stock Next.js setup+6
Next.js with no apparent customisation of the default scaffold.
Default asset
Signs a human was here
✓
Real site pages-4
Links to genuine pages (about, blog, pricing, docs) suggest real effort.
Human signal
✓
Considered metadata-2
A real meta description plus Open Graph tags show care.
Human signal
✓
Custom typography-2
Self-hosted or custom web fonts, not just system defaults.
Human signal
✓
Custom favicon-2
A real, non-default favicon, a small sign someone cared.
Human signal
Slopdar reports signals, not proof. A high score means a site smells templated, not that no human was ever involved.