Is screenpay.com.au built or slop?

Name: Slopdar Slop Score for screenpay.com.au
Item: screenpay.com.au
Rating: 32
Author: Slopdar

Slopdar scanned screenpay.com.au and gave it a Slop Score of 32/100 (Suspiciously Clean). 5 AI / vibe-coding tells were found. These are signals, not proof.

“Suspiciously clean. Either a careful human, or a very careful prompt.”

Scan your own site →

Caught on camera

The usual suspects

BootstrapNext.jsVercel

The receipts

5 tells found

Placeholder brand name+16

Template placeholders like "Your Company" / "Acme" remain.

Leftover junk

lucide-react icons+8

The default icon set shipped with most AI-generated UIs.

Default asset

Stock Next.js setup+6

Next.js with no apparent customisation of the default scaffold.

Default asset

Three-feature-card grid+6

The hero-plus-three-cards layout AI builders default to.

Layout tell

Hosted on Vercel+6

Vercel hosting headers were present.

Stack tell

Signs a human was here

✓

Considered metadata-4

A real meta description plus Open Graph tags show care.

Human signal

✓

Custom typography-3

Self-hosted or custom web fonts, not just system defaults.

Human signal

✓

Custom favicon-3

A real, non-default favicon, a small sign someone cared.

Human signal

Slopdar reports signals, not proof. A high score means a site smells templated, not that no human was ever involved.