SSlopdar
40slop score / 100
Suspiciously Clean
🔥 roasted once

Is sanvira.com built or slop?

Slopdar scanned sanvira.com and gave it a Slop Score of 40/100 (Suspiciously Clean). 5 AI / vibe-coding tells were found. These are signals, not proof.

“'Your Company' is still in the copy. We assume that's the legal name.”

Caught on camera
Screenshot of sanvira.com
The usual suspects
BootstrapSupabaseVercel

The receipts

5 tells found
01
Placeholder brand name+16
Template placeholders like "Your Company" / "Acme" remain.
Leftover junk
02
Supabase backend+7
Supabase client / project references were found.
Stack tell
03
Hosted on Vercel+6
Vercel hosting headers were present.
Stack tell
04
Missing social/meta tags+6
No meta description and no Open Graph tags, a low-effort sign.
Low-effort tell
05
No custom favicon+5
The site ships without a favicon link.
Low-effort tell

Slopdar reports signals, not proof. A high score means a site smells templated, not that no human was ever involved.

Fix your slop

up to 27 points on the table

Every tell below can be cleared. Do it by hand, or copy the fix prompt and paste it into whatever built this (Claude Code, Cursor, Lovable, you name it). Then re-scan and watch the score drop.

01
Placeholder brand nameclears +16
Replace placeholder brand names with your real name.
02
Missing social/meta tagsclears +6
Add a real meta description and Open Graph tags.
03
No custom faviconclears +5
Add a favicon.
Quick winshuman signs the radar rewards
+
Add real pagesReal about / pricing / contact pages linked from the homepage are a strong human sign.
+
Link your GitHubIf the project is open source or you have a real profile, link it.
+
Custom typographyA deliberately chosen web font reads as a human decision.

The prompt only removes the tells Slopdar can see. Making the site genuinely good is still on you.