27slop score / 100
Suspiciously Clean
🔥 roasted once
Is s-markets.com built or slop?
Slopdar scanned s-markets.com and gave it a Slop Score of 27/100 (Suspiciously Clean). 4 AI / vibe-coding tells were found. These are signals, not proof.
“Nobody types that many em dashes on purpose. Nobody.”
Caught on camera
The usual suspects
BootstrapVercel
The receipts
4 tells found01
High em-dash density+10
Em-dashes show up unusually often. A classic LLM writing tic.
Copy tell
02
Default Vite build+8
An untouched Vite build signature was detected.
Default asset
03
Hosted on Vercel+6
Vercel hosting headers were present.
Stack tell
04
No custom favicon+5
The site ships without a favicon link.
Low-effort tell
Signs a human was here
✓
Considered metadata-2
A real meta description plus Open Graph tags show care.
Human signal
Slopdar reports signals, not proof. A high score means a site smells templated, not that no human was ever involved.
Fix your slop
up to 15 points on the tableEvery tell below can be cleared. Do it by hand, or copy the fix prompt and paste it into whatever built this (Claude Code, Cursor, Lovable, you name it). Then re-scan and watch the score drop.
01
High em-dash densityclears +10
Rewrite the copy with fewer em dashes. Use periods, commas or a rephrase instead.
02
No custom faviconclears +5
Add a favicon.
Quick winshuman signs the radar rewards
+
Add real pagesReal about / pricing / contact pages linked from the homepage are a strong human sign.
+
Link your GitHubIf the project is open source or you have a real profile, link it.
+
Custom typographyA deliberately chosen web font reads as a human decision.
The prompt only removes the tells Slopdar can see. Making the site genuinely good is still on you.