63slop score / 100
Vibe-Coded
🔥 roasted 3 times
Is revispy.com built or slop?
Slopdar scanned revispy.com and gave it a Slop Score of 63/100 (Vibe-Coded). 9 AI / vibe-coding tells were found. These are signals, not proof.
“Half artisan, half autocomplete. We can see the seams from here.”
Caught on camera
The usual suspects
BootstrapGoogle AnalyticsNext.js
The receipts
9 tells found01
Placeholder brand name+16
Template placeholders like "Your Company" / "Acme" remain.
Leftover junk
02
Untouched shadcn/ui+12
Default shadcn/ui class signatures with no custom theming.
Default asset
03
Dead placeholder links+10
Many links still point to "#" or example.com.
Leftover junk
04
lucide-react icons+8
The default icon set shipped with most AI-generated UIs.
Default asset
05
"Trusted by" logo row+7
A "Trusted by" / "As seen in" social-proof row was found.
Layout tell
06
Stock Next.js setup+6
Next.js with no apparent customisation of the default scaffold.
Default asset
07
Three-feature-card grid+6
The hero-plus-three-cards layout AI builders default to.
Layout tell
08
Images missing alt text+6
Most images have no alt text, a sign of unreviewed output.
Low-effort tell
09
Dark mode with neon accents+5
A near-black background with saturated neon accents, a common AI look.
Layout tell
Signs a human was here
✓
Real site pages-4
Links to genuine pages (about, blog, pricing, docs) suggest real effort.
Human signal
✓
Links to GitHub-3
A real GitHub link points to actual source or a real person.
Human signal
✓
Considered metadata-2
A real meta description plus Open Graph tags show care.
Human signal
✓
Custom typography-2
Self-hosted or custom web fonts, not just system defaults.
Human signal
✓
Custom favicon-2
A real, non-default favicon, a small sign someone cared.
Human signal
Slopdar reports signals, not proof. A high score means a site smells templated, not that no human was ever involved.