31slop score / 100
Suspiciously Clean
Is revid.ai built or slop?
Slopdar scanned revid.ai and gave it a Slop Score of 31/100 (Suspiciously Clean). 5 AI / vibe-coding tells were found. These are signals, not proof.
“Suspiciously clean. Either a careful human, or a very careful prompt.”
Caught on camera
The usual suspects
BootstrapCloudflareGoogle AnalyticsNext.jsTailwind CSSVercel
The receipts
5 tells found01
AI marketing buzzwords+12
Clusters of "elevate / seamless / supercharge"-style filler.
Copy tell
02
lucide-react icons+8
The default icon set shipped with most AI-generated UIs.
Default asset
03
"Trusted by" logo row+7
A "Trusted by" / "As seen in" social-proof row was found.
Layout tell
04
Three-feature-card grid+6
The hero-plus-three-cards layout AI builders default to.
Layout tell
05
Hosted on Vercel+6
Vercel hosting headers were present.
Stack tell
Signs a human was here
✓
Real site pages-4
Links to genuine pages (about, blog, pricing, docs) suggest real effort.
Human signal
✓
Considered metadata-2
A real meta description plus Open Graph tags show care.
Human signal
✓
Custom favicon-2
A real, non-default favicon, a small sign someone cared.
Human signal
Slopdar reports signals, not proof. A high score means a site smells templated, not that no human was ever involved.