22slop score / 100
Hand-Crafted
🔥 roasted once
Is reeseyshawcuratorial.com built or slop?
Slopdar scanned reeseyshawcuratorial.com and gave it a Slop Score of 22/100 (Hand-Crafted). 4 AI / vibe-coding tells were found. These are signals, not proof.
“Annoyingly original. We tried so hard to roast it.”
Caught on camera
The usual suspects
BootstrapGoogle AnalyticsNext.jsVercel
The receipts
4 tells found01
Bento-grid layout+9
Bento-style grid markup: a default AI landing-page pattern.
Layout tell
02
Gradient blobs / aurora+9
Large blurred gradient backgrounds: a stock decorative pattern.
Layout tell
03
Stock Next.js setup+6
Next.js with no apparent customisation of the default scaffold.
Default asset
04
Hosted on Vercel+6
Vercel hosting headers were present.
Stack tell
Signs a human was here
✓
Real site pages-4
Links to genuine pages (about, blog, pricing, docs) suggest real effort.
Human signal
✓
Considered metadata-2
A real meta description plus Open Graph tags show care.
Human signal
✓
Custom favicon-2
A real, non-default favicon, a small sign someone cared.
Human signal
Slopdar reports signals, not proof. A high score means a site smells templated, not that no human was ever involved.
Fix your slop
up to 18 points on the tableEvery tell below can be cleared. Do it by hand, or copy the fix prompt and paste it into whatever built this (Claude Code, Cursor, Lovable, you name it). Then re-scan and watch the score drop.
01
Bento-grid layoutclears +9
The bento grid is the default AI landing-page shape. Rework it into a layout that fits your actual content.
02
Gradient blobs / auroraclears +9
Replace the blurred gradient blob backgrounds with something specific to your brand.
Quick winshuman signs the radar rewards
+
Link your GitHubIf the project is open source or you have a real profile, link it.
+
Custom typographyA deliberately chosen web font reads as a human decision.
The prompt only removes the tells Slopdar can see. Making the site genuinely good is still on you.