42slop score / 100
Suspiciously Clean
🔥 roasted once
Is rauds.co.uk built or slop?
Slopdar scanned rauds.co.uk and gave it a Slop Score of 42/100 (Suspiciously Clean). 3 AI / vibe-coding tells were found. These are signals, not proof.
“The em dashes gave it away. They always do.”
Caught on camera
The usual suspects
Cloudflare
The receipts
3 tells found01
Built with Base44+32
Base44 (an AI app builder) artifacts were detected.
Tool fingerprint
02
High em-dash density+10
Em-dashes show up unusually often. A classic LLM writing tic.
Copy tell
03
Default Vite build+8
An untouched Vite build signature was detected.
Default asset
Signs a human was here
✓
Real site pages-4
Links to genuine pages (about, blog, pricing, docs) suggest real effort.
Human signal
✓
Considered metadata-2
A real meta description plus Open Graph tags show care.
Human signal
✓
Custom favicon-2
A real, non-default favicon, a small sign someone cared.
Human signal
Slopdar reports signals, not proof. A high score means a site smells templated, not that no human was ever involved.
Fix your slop
up to 42 points on the tableEvery tell below can be cleared. Do it by hand, or copy the fix prompt and paste it into whatever built this (Claude Code, Cursor, Lovable, you name it). Then re-scan and watch the score drop.
01
Built with Base44clears +32
Serve the site from your own domain and remove Base44 script and meta references.
02
High em-dash densityclears +10
Rewrite the copy with fewer em dashes. Use periods, commas or a rephrase instead.
Quick winshuman signs the radar rewards
+
Link your GitHubIf the project is open source or you have a real profile, link it.
+
Custom typographyA deliberately chosen web font reads as a human decision.
The prompt only removes the tells Slopdar can see. Making the site genuinely good is still on you.