30slop score / 100
Suspiciously Clean
🔥 roasted once
Is quick-sale.net built or slop?
Slopdar scanned quick-sale.net and gave it a Slop Score of 30/100 (Suspiciously Clean). 4 AI / vibe-coding tells were found. These are signals, not proof.
“Still shipping the create-next-app furniture. Vercel says hi.”
Caught on camera
The usual suspects
BootstrapCloudflareNext.jsTailwind CSS
The receipts
4 tells found01
Radix UI primitives+10
Radix UI primitives (the shadcn/ui foundation) were detected.
Default asset
02
Dead placeholder links+10
Many links still point to "#" or example.com.
Leftover junk
03
lucide-react icons+8
The default icon set shipped with most AI-generated UIs.
Default asset
04
Stock Next.js setup+6
Next.js with no apparent customisation of the default scaffold.
Default asset
Signs a human was here
✓
Custom typography-2
Self-hosted or custom web fonts, not just system defaults.
Human signal
✓
Custom favicon-2
A real, non-default favicon, a small sign someone cared.
Human signal
Slopdar reports signals, not proof. A high score means a site smells templated, not that no human was ever involved.
Fix your slop
up to 18 points on the tableEvery tell below can be cleared. Do it by hand, or copy the fix prompt and paste it into whatever built this (Claude Code, Cursor, Lovable, you name it). Then re-scan and watch the score drop.
01
Dead placeholder linksclears +10
Point the dead "#" links at real pages, or remove them.
02
lucide-react iconsclears +8
lucide is fine on its own. It reads as a tell when everything else is also default. Consider a different icon set or a few custom icons.
Quick winshuman signs the radar rewards
+
Add real pagesReal about / pricing / contact pages linked from the homepage are a strong human sign.
+
Link your GitHubIf the project is open source or you have a real profile, link it.
+
Considered metadataA real meta description plus Open Graph tags show care.
The prompt only removes the tells Slopdar can see. Making the site genuinely good is still on you.