38slop score / 100
Suspiciously Clean
Is prompthance.com built or slop?
Slopdar scanned prompthance.com and gave it a Slop Score of 38/100 (Suspiciously Clean). 6 AI / vibe-coding tells were found. These are signals, not proof.
“Suspiciously clean. Either a careful human, or a very careful prompt.”
Caught on camera
The usual suspects
BootstrapGoogle AnalyticsNext.jsTailwind CSSVercel
The receipts
6 tells found01
Gradient blobs / aurora+9
Large blurred gradient backgrounds: a stock decorative pattern.
Layout tell
02
lucide-react icons+8
The default icon set shipped with most AI-generated UIs.
Default asset
03
"Trusted by" logo row+7
A "Trusted by" / "As seen in" social-proof row was found.
Layout tell
04
Stock Next.js setup+6
Next.js with no apparent customisation of the default scaffold.
Default asset
05
Three-feature-card grid+6
The hero-plus-three-cards layout AI builders default to.
Layout tell
06
Hosted on Vercel+6
Vercel hosting headers were present.
Stack tell
Signs a human was here
✓
Considered metadata-2
A real meta description plus Open Graph tags show care.
Human signal
✓
Custom typography-2
Self-hosted or custom web fonts, not just system defaults.
Human signal
Slopdar reports signals, not proof. A high score means a site smells templated, not that no human was ever involved.