SSlopdar
9slop score / 100
Hand-Crafted
🔥 roasted once

Is praktijkvanderboom.nl built or slop?

Slopdar scanned praktijkvanderboom.nl and gave it a Slop Score of 9/100 (Hand-Crafted). 2 AI / vibe-coding tells were found. These are signals, not proof.

“Ugh, fine. A human made this. With their hands. On purpose.”

Caught on camera
Screenshot of praktijkvanderboom.nl
The usual suspects
BootstrapNetlifyNuxtVue.js

The receipts

2 tells found
01
lucide-react icons+8
The default icon set shipped with most AI-generated UIs.
Default asset
02
Hosted on Netlify+5
Netlify hosting headers were present.
Stack tell
Signs a human was here
✓
Considered metadata-2
A real meta description plus Open Graph tags show care.
Human signal
✓
Custom favicon-2
A real, non-default favicon, a small sign someone cared.
Human signal

Slopdar reports signals, not proof. A high score means a site smells templated, not that no human was ever involved.

Fix your slop

up to 8 points on the table

Every tell below can be cleared. Do it by hand, or copy the fix prompt and paste it into whatever built this (Claude Code, Cursor, Lovable, you name it). Then re-scan and watch the score drop.

01
lucide-react iconsclears +8
lucide is fine on its own. It reads as a tell when everything else is also default. Consider a different icon set or a few custom icons.
Quick winshuman signs the radar rewards
+
Add real pagesReal about / pricing / contact pages linked from the homepage are a strong human sign.
+
Link your GitHubIf the project is open source or you have a real profile, link it.
+
Custom typographyA deliberately chosen web font reads as a human decision.

The prompt only removes the tells Slopdar can see. Making the site genuinely good is still on you.