81slop score / 100
Pure Slop
🔥 roasted once
Is pqtl.vercel.app built or slop?
Slopdar scanned pqtl.vercel.app and gave it a Slop Score of 81/100 (Pure Slop). 8 AI / vibe-coding tells were found. These are signals, not proof.
“This wasn't built. It was prompted, deployed, and prayed over.”
Caught on camera
The usual suspects
BootstrapNext.jsVercel
The receipts
8 tells found01
Built with v0.dev+35
References to Vercel's v0 generator were found in the page source.
Tool fingerprint
02
Untouched shadcn/ui+12
Default shadcn/ui class signatures with no custom theming.
Default asset
03
Gradient blobs / aurora+9
Large blurred gradient backgrounds: a stock decorative pattern.
Layout tell
04
lucide-react icons+8
The default icon set shipped with most AI-generated UIs.
Default asset
05
Stock Next.js setup+6
Next.js with no apparent customisation of the default scaffold.
Default asset
06
Three-feature-card grid+6
The hero-plus-three-cards layout AI builders default to.
Layout tell
07
Hosted on Vercel+6
Vercel hosting headers were present.
Stack tell
08
No custom favicon+5
The site ships without a favicon link.
Low-effort tell
Signs a human was here
✓
Real site pages-4
Links to genuine pages (about, blog, pricing, docs) suggest real effort.
Human signal
✓
Custom typography-2
Self-hosted or custom web fonts, not just system defaults.
Human signal
Slopdar reports signals, not proof. A high score means a site smells templated, not that no human was ever involved.