29slop score / 100
Suspiciously Clean
Is posthog.com built or slop?
Slopdar scanned posthog.com and gave it a Slop Score of 29/100 (Suspiciously Clean). 7 AI / vibe-coding tells were found. These are signals, not proof.
“Suspiciously clean. Either a careful human, or a very careful prompt.”
Caught on camera
The usual suspects
BootstrapGatsbyVercel
The receipts
7 tells found01
Radix UI primitives+10
Radix UI primitives (the shadcn/ui foundation) were detected.
Default asset
02
Gradient blobs / aurora+9
Large blurred gradient backgrounds: a stock decorative pattern.
Layout tell
03
Negative-parallelism phrasing+6
LLM-favoured "it's not just X, it's Y" / "not only ... but also" phrasing.
Copy tell
04
Three-feature-card grid+6
The hero-plus-three-cards layout AI builders default to.
Layout tell
05
Hosted on Vercel+6
Vercel hosting headers were present.
Stack tell
06
Images missing alt text+6
Most images have no alt text, a sign of unreviewed output.
Low-effort tell
07
No lang attribute+4
The <html> tag has no lang attribute set.
Low-effort tell
Signs a human was here
✓
Real site pages-8
Links to genuine pages (about, blog, pricing, docs) suggest real effort.
Human signal
✓
Considered metadata-4
A real meta description plus Open Graph tags show care.
Human signal
✓
Custom typography-3
Self-hosted or custom web fonts, not just system defaults.
Human signal
✓
Custom favicon-3
A real, non-default favicon, a small sign someone cared.
Human signal
Slopdar reports signals, not proof. A high score means a site smells templated, not that no human was ever involved.