SSlopdar
21slop score / 100
Hand-Crafted
🔥 roasted once

Is paraxe.xyz built or slop?

Slopdar scanned paraxe.xyz and gave it a Slop Score of 21/100 (Hand-Crafted). 3 AI / vibe-coding tells were found. These are signals, not proof.

“You wrote your own CSS. In this economy?”

Caught on camera
Screenshot of paraxe.xyz
The usual suspects
BootstrapTailwind CSS

The receipts

3 tells found
01
Tailwind via CDN+14
Tailwind loaded from the play CDN: a prototyping/quick-build tell.
Default asset
02
Bento-grid layout+9
Bento-style grid markup: a default AI landing-page pattern.
Layout tell
03
Three-feature-card grid+6
The hero-plus-three-cards layout AI builders default to.
Layout tell
Signs a human was here
✓
Real site pages-4
Links to genuine pages (about, blog, pricing, docs) suggest real effort.
Human signal
✓
Considered metadata-2
A real meta description plus Open Graph tags show care.
Human signal
✓
Custom favicon-2
A real, non-default favicon, a small sign someone cared.
Human signal

Slopdar reports signals, not proof. A high score means a site smells templated, not that no human was ever involved.

Fix your slop

up to 29 points on the table

Every tell below can be cleared. Do it by hand, or copy the fix prompt and paste it into whatever built this (Claude Code, Cursor, Lovable, you name it). Then re-scan and watch the score drop.

01
Tailwind via CDNclears +14
Install Tailwind as a build dependency instead of loading it from the play CDN.
02
Bento-grid layoutclears +9
The bento grid is the default AI landing-page shape. Rework it into a layout that fits your actual content.
03
Three-feature-card gridclears +6
The hero-plus-three-cards layout is the AI default. Vary it if your content allows.
Quick winshuman signs the radar rewards
+
Link your GitHubIf the project is open source or you have a real profile, link it.
+
Custom typographyA deliberately chosen web font reads as a human decision.

The prompt only removes the tells Slopdar can see. Making the site genuinely good is still on you.