Is painter-site-gules.vercel.app built or slop?

Name: Slopdar Slop Score for painter-site-gules.vercel.app
Item: painter-site-gules.vercel.app
Rating: 16
Author: Slopdar

Slopdar scanned painter-site-gules.vercel.app and gave it a Slop Score of 16/100 (Hand-Crafted). 3 AI / vibe-coding tells were found. These are signals, not proof.

“Ugh, fine. A human made this. With their hands. On purpose.”

Scan your own site →

Caught on camera

Screenshot of painter-site-gules.vercel.app

The usual suspects

BootstrapNext.jsTailwind CSSVercel

The receipts

3 tells found

Dead placeholder links+10

Many links still point to "#" or example.com.

Leftover junk

Stock Next.js setup+6

Next.js with no apparent customisation of the default scaffold.

Default asset

Hosted on Vercel+6

Vercel hosting headers were present.

Stack tell

Signs a human was here

✓

Custom typography-3

Self-hosted or custom web fonts, not just system defaults.

Human signal

✓

Custom favicon-3

A real, non-default favicon, a small sign someone cared.

Human signal

Slopdar reports signals, not proof. A high score means a site smells templated, not that no human was ever involved.