Is oscode.co.in built or slop?

Name: Slopdar Slop Score for oscode.co.in
Item: oscode.co.in
Rating: 40
Author: Slopdar

Slopdar scanned oscode.co.in and gave it a Slop Score of 40/100 (Suspiciously Clean). 7 AI / vibe-coding tells were found. These are signals, not proof.

“Suspiciously clean. Either a careful human, or a very careful prompt.”

Scan your own site →

Caught on camera

The usual suspects

BootstrapNext.jsSupabaseTailwind CSSVercel

The receipts

7 tells found

Classic vibe-coding stack+10

Next.js + Vercel + Supabase together: the default AI-build combo.

Stack tell

Gradient blobs / aurora+9

Large blurred gradient backgrounds: a stock decorative pattern.

Layout tell

lucide-react icons+8

The default icon set shipped with most AI-generated UIs.

Default asset

Supabase backend+7

Supabase client / project references were found.

Stack tell

Stock Next.js setup+6

Next.js with no apparent customisation of the default scaffold.

Default asset

Three-feature-card grid+6

The hero-plus-three-cards layout AI builders default to.

Layout tell

Hosted on Vercel+6

Vercel hosting headers were present.

Stack tell

Signs a human was here

✓

Links to GitHub-5

A real GitHub link points to actual source or a real person.

Human signal

✓

Considered metadata-4

A real meta description plus Open Graph tags show care.

Human signal

✓

Custom typography-3

Self-hosted or custom web fonts, not just system defaults.

Human signal

Slopdar reports signals, not proof. A high score means a site smells templated, not that no human was ever involved.