SSlopdar
4slop score / 100
Hand-Crafted
🔥 roasted once

Is newrelic.com built or slop?

Slopdar scanned newrelic.com and gave it a Slop Score of 4/100 (Hand-Crafted). 1 AI / vibe-coding tells were found. These are signals, not proof.

“Somewhere an AI site builder just felt a disturbance.”

Caught on camera
Screenshot of newrelic.com
The usual suspects
BootstrapTailwind CSS

The receipts

1 tells found
01
"Trusted by" logo row+7
A "Trusted by" / "As seen in" social-proof row was found.
Layout tell
Signs a human was here
✓
Real site pages-4
Links to genuine pages (about, blog, pricing, docs) suggest real effort.
Human signal
✓
Links to GitHub-3
A real GitHub link points to actual source or a real person.
Human signal
✓
Considered metadata-2
A real meta description plus Open Graph tags show care.
Human signal
✓
Custom typography-2
Self-hosted or custom web fonts, not just system defaults.
Human signal
✓
Custom favicon-2
A real, non-default favicon, a small sign someone cared.
Human signal

Slopdar reports signals, not proof. A high score means a site smells templated, not that no human was ever involved.

Fix your slop

up to 7 points on the table

Every tell below can be cleared. Do it by hand, or copy the fix prompt and paste it into whatever built this (Claude Code, Cursor, Lovable, you name it). Then re-scan and watch the score drop.

01
"Trusted by" logo rowclears +7
Only keep the "Trusted by" row if the logos are real. If they are not, remove it.

The prompt only removes the tells Slopdar can see. Making the site genuinely good is still on you.