SSlopdar
18slop score / 100
Hand-Crafted
🔥 roasted once

Is name.com built or slop?

Slopdar scanned name.com and gave it a Slop Score of 18/100 (Hand-Crafted). 3 AI / vibe-coding tells were found. These are signals, not proof.

“We scanned for slop and found craftsmanship. Disgusting. Wonderful.”

Caught on camera
Screenshot of name.com
The usual suspects
BootstrapCloudflareNuxtTailwind CSSVue.js

The receipts

3 tells found
01
Placeholder brand name+16
Template placeholders like "Your Company" / "Acme" remain.
Leftover junk
02
Three-feature-card grid+6
The hero-plus-three-cards layout AI builders default to.
Layout tell
03
No lang attribute+4
The <html> tag has no lang attribute set.
Low-effort tell
Signs a human was here
✓
Real site pages-4
Links to genuine pages (about, blog, pricing, docs) suggest real effort.
Human signal
✓
Custom typography-2
Self-hosted or custom web fonts, not just system defaults.
Human signal
✓
Custom favicon-2
A real, non-default favicon, a small sign someone cared.
Human signal

Slopdar reports signals, not proof. A high score means a site smells templated, not that no human was ever involved.

Fix your slop

up to 26 points on the table

Every tell below can be cleared. Do it by hand, or copy the fix prompt and paste it into whatever built this (Claude Code, Cursor, Lovable, you name it). Then re-scan and watch the score drop.

01
Placeholder brand nameclears +16
Replace placeholder brand names with your real name.
02
Three-feature-card gridclears +6
The hero-plus-three-cards layout is the AI default. Vary it if your content allows.
03
No lang attributeclears +4
Add a lang attribute to the <html> tag.
Quick winshuman signs the radar rewards
+
Link your GitHubIf the project is open source or you have a real profile, link it.
+
Considered metadataA real meta description plus Open Graph tags show care.

The prompt only removes the tells Slopdar can see. Making the site genuinely good is still on you.