SSlopdar
17slop score / 100
Hand-Crafted
🔥 roasted once

Is mp3quran.net built or slop?

Slopdar scanned mp3quran.net and gave it a Slop Score of 17/100 (Hand-Crafted). 3 AI / vibe-coding tells were found. These are signals, not proof.

We scanned for slop and found craftsmanship. Disgusting. Wonderful.

Caught on camera
Screenshot of mp3quran.net
The usual suspects
BootstrapCloudflareGoogle AnalyticsTailwind CSS

The receipts

3 tells found
01
Dead placeholder links+10
Many links still point to "#" or example.com.
Leftover junk
02
Three-feature-card grid+6
The hero-plus-three-cards layout AI builders default to.
Layout tell
03
No custom favicon+5
The site ships without a favicon link.
Low-effort tell
Signs a human was here
Real site pages-4
Links to genuine pages (about, blog, pricing, docs) suggest real effort.
Human signal

Slopdar reports signals, not proof. A high score means a site smells templated, not that no human was ever involved.

Fix your slop

up to 21 points on the table

Every tell below can be cleared. Do it by hand, or copy the fix prompt and paste it into whatever built this (Claude Code, Cursor, Lovable, you name it). Then re-scan and watch the score drop.

01
Dead placeholder linksclears +10
Point the dead "#" links at real pages, or remove them.
02
Three-feature-card gridclears +6
The hero-plus-three-cards layout is the AI default. Vary it if your content allows.
03
No custom faviconclears +5
Add a favicon.
Quick winshuman signs the radar rewards
+
Link your GitHubIf the project is open source or you have a real profile, link it.
+
Considered metadataA real meta description plus Open Graph tags show care.
+
Custom typographyA deliberately chosen web font reads as a human decision.

The prompt only removes the tells Slopdar can see. Making the site genuinely good is still on you.