27slop score / 100
Suspiciously Clean
🔥 roasted once
Is mgidirect.co.uk built or slop?
Slopdar scanned mgidirect.co.uk and gave it a Slop Score of 27/100 (Suspiciously Clean). 4 AI / vibe-coding tells were found. These are signals, not proof.
“Zero alt text. The robots wrote it and still forgot the other robots.”
Caught on camera
The usual suspects
BootstrapGoogle Analytics
The receipts
4 tells found01
Dead placeholder links+10
Many links still point to "#" or example.com.
Leftover junk
02
Negative-parallelism phrasing+6
LLM-favoured "it's not just X, it's Y" / "not only ... but also" phrasing.
Copy tell
03
Images missing alt text+6
Most images have no alt text, a sign of unreviewed output.
Low-effort tell
04
No custom favicon+5
The site ships without a favicon link.
Low-effort tell
Slopdar reports signals, not proof. A high score means a site smells templated, not that no human was ever involved.
Fix your slop
up to 27 points on the tableEvery tell below can be cleared. Do it by hand, or copy the fix prompt and paste it into whatever built this (Claude Code, Cursor, Lovable, you name it). Then re-scan and watch the score drop.
01
Dead placeholder linksclears +10
Point the dead "#" links at real pages, or remove them.
02
Negative-parallelism phrasingclears +6
Rewrite "it's not just X, it's Y" sentences as direct statements.
03
Images missing alt textclears +6
Add alt text to the images that are missing it.
04
No custom faviconclears +5
Add a favicon.
Quick winshuman signs the radar rewards
+
Add real pagesReal about / pricing / contact pages linked from the homepage are a strong human sign.
+
Link your GitHubIf the project is open source or you have a real profile, link it.
+
Considered metadataA real meta description plus Open Graph tags show care.
+
Custom typographyA deliberately chosen web font reads as a human decision.
The prompt only removes the tells Slopdar can see. Making the site genuinely good is still on you.