Is mediafa.st built or slop?

Name: Slopdar Slop Score for mediafa.st
Item: mediafa.st
Rating: 37
Author: Slopdar

Slopdar scanned mediafa.st and gave it a Slop Score of 37/100 (Suspiciously Clean). 5 AI / vibe-coding tells were found. These are signals, not proof.

“Suspiciously clean. Either a careful human, or a very careful prompt.”

Scan your own site →

Caught on camera

The usual suspects

BootstrapGoogle AnalyticsNext.jsTailwind CSSVercel

The receipts

5 tells found

Untouched shadcn/ui+12

Default shadcn/ui class signatures with no custom theming.

Default asset

Gradient blobs / aurora+9

Large blurred gradient backgrounds: a stock decorative pattern.

Layout tell

lucide-react icons+8

The default icon set shipped with most AI-generated UIs.

Default asset

Stock Next.js setup+6

Next.js with no apparent customisation of the default scaffold.

Default asset

Hosted on Vercel+6

Vercel hosting headers were present.

Stack tell

Signs a human was here

✓

Considered metadata-4

A real meta description plus Open Graph tags show care.

Human signal

Slopdar reports signals, not proof. A high score means a site smells templated, not that no human was ever involved.