50slop score / 100
Suspiciously Clean
🔥 roasted once
Is mediaboost.press built or slop?
Slopdar scanned mediaboost.press and gave it a Slop Score of 50/100 (Suspiciously Clean). 7 AI / vibe-coding tells were found. These are signals, not proof.
“'Your Company' is still in the copy. We assume that's the legal name.”
Caught on camera
The usual suspects
BootstrapNext.jsTailwind CSS
The receipts
7 tells found01
Placeholder brand name+16
Template placeholders like "Your Company" / "Acme" remain.
Leftover junk
02
Gradient blobs / aurora+9
Large blurred gradient backgrounds: a stock decorative pattern.
Layout tell
03
lucide-react icons+8
The default icon set shipped with most AI-generated UIs.
Default asset
04
Signature AI gradient palette+8
The blue/indigo/violet gradient AI builds reach for by default.
Layout tell
05
"Trusted by" logo row+7
A "Trusted by" / "As seen in" social-proof row was found.
Layout tell
06
Stock Next.js setup+6
Next.js with no apparent customisation of the default scaffold.
Default asset
07
Three-feature-card grid+6
The hero-plus-three-cards layout AI builders default to.
Layout tell
Signs a human was here
✓
Real site pages-4
Links to genuine pages (about, blog, pricing, docs) suggest real effort.
Human signal
✓
Considered metadata-2
A real meta description plus Open Graph tags show care.
Human signal
✓
Custom typography-2
Self-hosted or custom web fonts, not just system defaults.
Human signal
✓
Custom favicon-2
A real, non-default favicon, a small sign someone cared.
Human signal
Slopdar reports signals, not proof. A high score means a site smells templated, not that no human was ever involved.