SSlopdar
1slop score / 100
Hand-Crafted

Is macro.com built or slop?

Slopdar scanned macro.com and gave it a Slop Score of 1/100 (Hand-Crafted). 3 AI / vibe-coding tells were found. These are signals, not proof.

Ugh, fine. A human made this. With their hands. On purpose.

Scan your own site →
Caught on camera
Screenshot of macro.com
The usual suspects
Bootstrap

The receipts

3 tells found
01
High em-dash density+10
Em-dashes show up unusually often. A classic LLM writing tic.
Copy tell
02
Default Vite build+8
An untouched Vite build signature was detected.
Default asset
03
Images missing alt text+6
Most images have no alt text, a sign of unreviewed output.
Low-effort tell
Signs a human was here
Real site pages-8
Links to genuine pages (about, blog, pricing, docs) suggest real effort.
Human signal
Links to GitHub-5
A real GitHub link points to actual source or a real person.
Human signal
Considered metadata-4
A real meta description plus Open Graph tags show care.
Human signal
Custom typography-3
Self-hosted or custom web fonts, not just system defaults.
Human signal
Custom favicon-3
A real, non-default favicon, a small sign someone cared.
Human signal

Slopdar reports signals, not proof. A high score means a site smells templated, not that no human was ever involved.