SSlopdar
19slop score / 100
Hand-Crafted
🔥 roasted once

Is linktr.ee built or slop?

Slopdar scanned linktr.ee and gave it a Slop Score of 19/100 (Hand-Crafted). 3 AI / vibe-coding tells were found. These are signals, not proof.

“No lucide icons. No lorem ipsum. Who hurt the template industry?”

Caught on camera
Screenshot of linktr.ee
The usual suspects
BootstrapNext.js

The receipts

3 tells found
01
Placeholder brand name+16
Template placeholders like "Your Company" / "Acme" remain.
Leftover junk
02
"Trusted by" logo row+7
A "Trusted by" / "As seen in" social-proof row was found.
Layout tell
03
Stock Next.js setup+6
Next.js with no apparent customisation of the default scaffold.
Default asset
Signs a human was here
✓
Real site pages-4
Links to genuine pages (about, blog, pricing, docs) suggest real effort.
Human signal
✓
Considered metadata-2
A real meta description plus Open Graph tags show care.
Human signal
✓
Custom typography-2
Self-hosted or custom web fonts, not just system defaults.
Human signal
✓
Custom favicon-2
A real, non-default favicon, a small sign someone cared.
Human signal

Slopdar reports signals, not proof. A high score means a site smells templated, not that no human was ever involved.

Fix your slop

up to 23 points on the table

Every tell below can be cleared. Do it by hand, or copy the fix prompt and paste it into whatever built this (Claude Code, Cursor, Lovable, you name it). Then re-scan and watch the score drop.

01
Placeholder brand nameclears +16
Replace placeholder brand names with your real name.
02
"Trusted by" logo rowclears +7
Only keep the "Trusted by" row if the logos are real. If they are not, remove it.
Quick winshuman signs the radar rewards
+
Link your GitHubIf the project is open source or you have a real profile, link it.

The prompt only removes the tells Slopdar can see. Making the site genuinely good is still on you.