8slop score / 100
Hand-Crafted
🔥 roasted once
Is laracon.us built or slop?
Slopdar scanned laracon.us and gave it a Slop Score of 8/100 (Hand-Crafted). 2 AI / vibe-coding tells were found. These are signals, not proof.
“You wrote your own CSS. In this economy?”
Caught on camera

The usual suspects
BootstrapCloudflare
The receipts
2 tells found01
Modern AI-build backend+8
Backend services common to AI-built apps (Convex, Clerk, Neon, etc.) were detected.
Stack tell
02
Three-feature-card grid+6
The hero-plus-three-cards layout AI builders default to.
Layout tell
Signs a human was here
✓
Considered metadata-2
A real meta description plus Open Graph tags show care.
Human signal
✓
Custom typography-2
Self-hosted or custom web fonts, not just system defaults.
Human signal
✓
Custom favicon-2
A real, non-default favicon, a small sign someone cared.
Human signal
Slopdar reports signals, not proof. A high score means a site smells templated, not that no human was ever involved.
Fix your slop
up to 6 points on the tableEvery tell below can be cleared. Do it by hand, or copy the fix prompt and paste it into whatever built this (Claude Code, Cursor, Lovable, you name it). Then re-scan and watch the score drop.
01
Three-feature-card gridclears +6
The hero-plus-three-cards layout is the AI default. Vary it if your content allows.
Quick winshuman signs the radar rewards
+
Add real pagesReal about / pricing / contact pages linked from the homepage are a strong human sign.
+
Link your GitHubIf the project is open source or you have a real profile, link it.
The prompt only removes the tells Slopdar can see. Making the site genuinely good is still on you.