26slop score / 100
Suspiciously Clean
🔥 roasted once
Is juris.ph built or slop?
Slopdar scanned juris.ph and gave it a Slop Score of 26/100 (Suspiciously Clean). 3 AI / vibe-coding tells were found. These are signals, not proof.
“Somewhere a lucide icon is being used exactly as the tutorial intended.”
Caught on camera

The usual suspects
CloudflareReactTailwind CSS
The receipts
3 tells found01
Tailwind via CDN+14
Tailwind loaded from the play CDN: a prototyping/quick-build tell.
Default asset
02
lucide-react icons+8
The default icon set shipped with most AI-generated UIs.
Default asset
03
Default Vite build+8
An untouched Vite build signature was detected.
Default asset
Signs a human was here
✓
Considered metadata-2
A real meta description plus Open Graph tags show care.
Human signal
✓
Custom favicon-2
A real, non-default favicon, a small sign someone cared.
Human signal
Slopdar reports signals, not proof. A high score means a site smells templated, not that no human was ever involved.
Fix your slop
up to 22 points on the tableEvery tell below can be cleared. Do it by hand, or copy the fix prompt and paste it into whatever built this (Claude Code, Cursor, Lovable, you name it). Then re-scan and watch the score drop.
01
Tailwind via CDNclears +14
Install Tailwind as a build dependency instead of loading it from the play CDN.
02
lucide-react iconsclears +8
lucide is fine on its own. It reads as a tell when everything else is also default. Consider a different icon set or a few custom icons.
Quick winshuman signs the radar rewards
+
Add real pagesReal about / pricing / contact pages linked from the homepage are a strong human sign.
+
Link your GitHubIf the project is open source or you have a real profile, link it.
+
Custom typographyA deliberately chosen web font reads as a human decision.
The prompt only removes the tells Slopdar can see. Making the site genuinely good is still on you.