SSlopdar
8slop score / 100
Hand-Crafted
🔥 roasted 2 times

Is iconconferences.org built or slop?

Slopdar scanned iconconferences.org and gave it a Slop Score of 8/100 (Hand-Crafted). 2 AI / vibe-coding tells were found. These are signals, not proof.

“Somewhere an AI site builder just felt a disturbance.”

Caught on camera
Screenshot of iconconferences.org
The usual suspects
BootstrapNext.jsVercel

The receipts

2 tells found
01
AI vocabulary cluster+10
A cluster of words LLMs overuse (delve, leverage, robust, etc.) appears in the copy.
Copy tell
02
Hosted on Vercel+6
Vercel hosting headers were present.
Stack tell
Signs a human was here
✓
Real site pages-4
Links to genuine pages (about, blog, pricing, docs) suggest real effort.
Human signal
✓
Considered metadata-2
A real meta description plus Open Graph tags show care.
Human signal
✓
Custom typography-2
Self-hosted or custom web fonts, not just system defaults.
Human signal
✓
Custom favicon-2
A real, non-default favicon, a small sign someone cared.
Human signal

Slopdar reports signals, not proof. A high score means a site smells templated, not that no human was ever involved.

Fix your slop

up to 10 points on the table

Every tell below can be cleared. Do it by hand, or copy the fix prompt and paste it into whatever built this (Claude Code, Cursor, Lovable, you name it). Then re-scan and watch the score drop.

01
AI vocabulary clusterclears +10
Swap LLM-favourite words (delve, leverage, robust) for plain ones.
Quick winshuman signs the radar rewards
+
Link your GitHubIf the project is open source or you have a real profile, link it.

The prompt only removes the tells Slopdar can see. Making the site genuinely good is still on you.