SSlopdar
32slop score / 100
Suspiciously Clean
🔥 roasted once

Is housr.com built or slop?

Slopdar scanned housr.com and gave it a Slop Score of 32/100 (Suspiciously Clean). 6 AI / vibe-coding tells were found. These are signals, not proof.

Suspiciously clean. Either a careful human, or a very careful prompt.

Scan your own site →
Caught on camera
Screenshot of housr.com
The usual suspects
BootstrapNext.jsTailwind CSSVercel

The receipts

6 tells found
01
Radix UI primitives+10
Radix UI primitives (the shadcn/ui foundation) were detected.
Default asset
02
lucide-react icons+8
The default icon set shipped with most AI-generated UIs.
Default asset
03
Stock Next.js setup+6
Next.js with no apparent customisation of the default scaffold.
Default asset
04
Three-feature-card grid+6
The hero-plus-three-cards layout AI builders default to.
Layout tell
05
Hosted on Vercel+6
Vercel hosting headers were present.
Stack tell
06
No lang attribute+4
The <html> tag has no lang attribute set.
Low-effort tell
Signs a human was here
Real site pages-4
Links to genuine pages (about, blog, pricing, docs) suggest real effort.
Human signal
Considered metadata-2
A real meta description plus Open Graph tags show care.
Human signal
Custom typography-2
Self-hosted or custom web fonts, not just system defaults.
Human signal

Slopdar reports signals, not proof. A high score means a site smells templated, not that no human was ever involved.