SSlopdar
5slop score / 100
Hand-Crafted
🔥 roasted once

Is haskell.org built or slop?

Slopdar scanned haskell.org and gave it a Slop Score of 5/100 (Hand-Crafted). 1 AI / vibe-coding tells were found. These are signals, not proof.

“A real website by a real person. We're framing this one.”

Caught on camera
Screenshot of haskell.org
The usual suspects
Bootstrap

The receipts

1 tells found
01
AI vocabulary cluster+10
A cluster of words LLMs overuse (delve, leverage, robust, etc.) appears in the copy.
Copy tell
Signs a human was here
✓
Links to GitHub-3
A real GitHub link points to actual source or a real person.
Human signal
✓
Custom favicon-2
A real, non-default favicon, a small sign someone cared.
Human signal

Slopdar reports signals, not proof. A high score means a site smells templated, not that no human was ever involved.

Fix your slop

up to 10 points on the table

Every tell below can be cleared. Do it by hand, or copy the fix prompt and paste it into whatever built this (Claude Code, Cursor, Lovable, you name it). Then re-scan and watch the score drop.

01
AI vocabulary clusterclears +10
Swap LLM-favourite words (delve, leverage, robust) for plain ones.
Quick winshuman signs the radar rewards
+
Add real pagesReal about / pricing / contact pages linked from the homepage are a strong human sign.
+
Considered metadataA real meta description plus Open Graph tags show care.
+
Custom typographyA deliberately chosen web font reads as a human decision.

The prompt only removes the tells Slopdar can see. Making the site genuinely good is still on you.