SSlopdar
8slop score / 100
Hand-Crafted
🔥 roasted once

Is golang.org built or slop?

Slopdar scanned golang.org and gave it a Slop Score of 8/100 (Hand-Crafted). 2 AI / vibe-coding tells were found. These are signals, not proof.

“This is what websites looked like before the great slop flood.”

Caught on camera
Screenshot of golang.org
The usual suspects
Bootstrap

The receipts

2 tells found
01
Dead placeholder links+10
Many links still point to "#" or example.com.
Leftover junk
02
Images missing alt text+6
Most images have no alt text, a sign of unreviewed output.
Low-effort tell
Signs a human was here
✓
Real site pages-4
Links to genuine pages (about, blog, pricing, docs) suggest real effort.
Human signal
✓
Links to GitHub-3
A real GitHub link points to actual source or a real person.
Human signal
✓
Custom favicon-2
A real, non-default favicon, a small sign someone cared.
Human signal

Slopdar reports signals, not proof. A high score means a site smells templated, not that no human was ever involved.

Fix your slop

up to 16 points on the table

Every tell below can be cleared. Do it by hand, or copy the fix prompt and paste it into whatever built this (Claude Code, Cursor, Lovable, you name it). Then re-scan and watch the score drop.

01
Dead placeholder linksclears +10
Point the dead "#" links at real pages, or remove them.
02
Images missing alt textclears +6
Add alt text to the images that are missing it.
Quick winshuman signs the radar rewards
+
Considered metadataA real meta description plus Open Graph tags show care.
+
Custom typographyA deliberately chosen web font reads as a human decision.

The prompt only removes the tells Slopdar can see. Making the site genuinely good is still on you.