SSlopdar
34slop score / 100
Suspiciously Clean
🔥 roasted once

Is framer.com built or slop?

Slopdar scanned framer.com and gave it a Slop Score of 34/100 (Suspiciously Clean). 3 AI / vibe-coding tells were found. These are signals, not proof.

“'Trusted by' logos detected. Trusted to fill that section of the template, mostly.”

Caught on camera
Screenshot of framer.com
The usual suspects
BootstrapFramerShopify

The receipts

3 tells found
01
Made with Framer+28
The page was published by Framer (no-code site builder).
Tool fingerprint
02
Bento-grid layout+9
Bento-style grid markup: a default AI landing-page pattern.
Layout tell
03
"Trusted by" logo row+7
A "Trusted by" / "As seen in" social-proof row was found.
Layout tell
Signs a human was here
✓
Real site pages-4
Links to genuine pages (about, blog, pricing, docs) suggest real effort.
Human signal
✓
Considered metadata-2
A real meta description plus Open Graph tags show care.
Human signal
✓
Custom typography-2
Self-hosted or custom web fonts, not just system defaults.
Human signal
✓
Custom favicon-2
A real, non-default favicon, a small sign someone cared.
Human signal

Slopdar reports signals, not proof. A high score means a site smells templated, not that no human was ever involved.

Fix your slop

up to 16 points on the table

Every tell below can be cleared. Do it by hand, or copy the fix prompt and paste it into whatever built this (Claude Code, Cursor, Lovable, you name it). Then re-scan and watch the score drop.

01
Bento-grid layoutclears +9
The bento grid is the default AI landing-page shape. Rework it into a layout that fits your actual content.
02
"Trusted by" logo rowclears +7
Only keep the "Trusted by" row if the logos are real. If they are not, remove it.
Quick winshuman signs the radar rewards
+
Link your GitHubIf the project is open source or you have a real profile, link it.

The prompt only removes the tells Slopdar can see. Making the site genuinely good is still on you.