9slop score / 100
Hand-Crafted
🔥 roasted once
Is folio.review built or slop?
Slopdar scanned folio.review and gave it a Slop Score of 9/100 (Hand-Crafted). 2 AI / vibe-coding tells were found. These are signals, not proof.
“Handmade, load-bearing, and rude to our business model.”
Caught on camera
The usual suspects
BootstrapGoogle AnalyticsTailwind CSS
The receipts
2 tells found01
Untouched shadcn/ui+12
Default shadcn/ui class signatures with no custom theming.
Default asset
02
Images missing alt text+6
Most images have no alt text, a sign of unreviewed output.
Low-effort tell
Signs a human was here
✓
Real site pages-4
Links to genuine pages (about, blog, pricing, docs) suggest real effort.
Human signal
✓
Considered metadata-2
A real meta description plus Open Graph tags show care.
Human signal
✓
Custom typography-2
Self-hosted or custom web fonts, not just system defaults.
Human signal
✓
Custom favicon-2
A real, non-default favicon, a small sign someone cared.
Human signal
Slopdar reports signals, not proof. A high score means a site smells templated, not that no human was ever involved.