SSlopdar
74slop score / 100
Vibe-Coded
🔥 roasted once

Is firsthook.app built or slop?

Slopdar scanned firsthook.app and gave it a Slop Score of 74/100 (Vibe-Coded). 7 AI / vibe-coding tells were found. These are signals, not proof.

Half artisan, half autocomplete. We can see the seams from here.

Scan your own site →
Caught on camera
Screenshot of firsthook.app
The usual suspects
BootstrapNext.jsVercel

The receipts

7 tells found
01
Built with v0.dev+35
References to Vercel's v0 generator were found in the page source.
Tool fingerprint
02
High em-dash density+10
Em-dashes show up unusually often. A classic LLM writing tic.
Copy tell
03
Gradient blobs / aurora+9
Large blurred gradient backgrounds: a stock decorative pattern.
Layout tell
04
lucide-react icons+8
The default icon set shipped with most AI-generated UIs.
Default asset
05
Stock Next.js setup+6
Next.js with no apparent customisation of the default scaffold.
Default asset
06
Three-feature-card grid+6
The hero-plus-three-cards layout AI builders default to.
Layout tell
07
Hosted on Vercel+6
Vercel hosting headers were present.
Stack tell
Signs a human was here
Considered metadata-2
A real meta description plus Open Graph tags show care.
Human signal
Custom typography-2
Self-hosted or custom web fonts, not just system defaults.
Human signal
Custom favicon-2
A real, non-default favicon, a small sign someone cared.
Human signal

Slopdar reports signals, not proof. A high score means a site smells templated, not that no human was ever involved.