SSlopdar
25slop score / 100
Hand-Crafted
🔥 roasted once

Is easyprincipal.com built or slop?

Slopdar scanned easyprincipal.com and gave it a Slop Score of 25/100 (Hand-Crafted). 4 AI / vibe-coding tells were found. These are signals, not proof.

“Handmade, load-bearing, and rude to our business model.”

Caught on camera
Screenshot of easyprincipal.com
The usual suspects
BootstrapNext.js

The receipts

4 tells found
01
lucide-react icons+8
The default icon set shipped with most AI-generated UIs.
Default asset
02
Stock Next.js setup+6
Next.js with no apparent customisation of the default scaffold.
Default asset
03
Three-feature-card grid+6
The hero-plus-three-cards layout AI builders default to.
Layout tell
04
No custom favicon+5
The site ships without a favicon link.
Low-effort tell

Slopdar reports signals, not proof. A high score means a site smells templated, not that no human was ever involved.

Fix your slop

up to 19 points on the table

Every tell below can be cleared. Do it by hand, or copy the fix prompt and paste it into whatever built this (Claude Code, Cursor, Lovable, you name it). Then re-scan and watch the score drop.

01
lucide-react iconsclears +8
lucide is fine on its own. It reads as a tell when everything else is also default. Consider a different icon set or a few custom icons.
02
Three-feature-card gridclears +6
The hero-plus-three-cards layout is the AI default. Vary it if your content allows.
03
No custom faviconclears +5
Add a favicon.
Quick winshuman signs the radar rewards
+
Add real pagesReal about / pricing / contact pages linked from the homepage are a strong human sign.
+
Link your GitHubIf the project is open source or you have a real profile, link it.
+
Considered metadataA real meta description plus Open Graph tags show care.
+
Custom typographyA deliberately chosen web font reads as a human decision.

The prompt only removes the tells Slopdar can see. Making the site genuinely good is still on you.